Feeding CM Punk And Seth Rollins’ Top Feud To Roman Reigns At WrestleMania 41 Might Be A Mistake

In the world of WWE, the decision-making process in professional wrestling depends on several elements including audience engagement, storyline development, and marketability. These perspectives may shed light in the feud between CM Punk, Seth Rollins, and Roman Reigns at WrestleMania 41.

Given the heat Seth Rollins and CM Punk’s feud has generated, it could have been better to book them in a singles fight at the Show of Shows. Adding Reigns to the mix dilutes the two year long story. With The OTC being the cover star of WWE 2K25, he would likely take the big win as the game is one of the sponsors of WrestleMania 41. If that happens, Punk and Rollins will both end up losing credibility.

History of the Feud between Rollins and CM Punk

For both fans and the business, CM Punk’s return to WWE is a big occurrence. His more practical personality and audience appeal define his past with the company. On top of that, Seth Rollins has become one of WWE’s top talents with powerful in-ring skills and character work.

Since the Second City Saint returned to WWE, the Visionary had shown his frustrations multiple times which has heightened the intensity of their feud. A rivalry between Punk and Rollins would probably play on their different styles and backgrounds, thereby drawing great spectator attention.

Roman Reigns’ Status

For several years now, WWE has placed Roman Reigns as a top star. His part as “The Tribal Chief” has received popular appeal and financial success. Featuring as the WWE 2K25 cover star confirms his standing within the organisation. His marketability usually helps him to be favoured in high-stakes play due to this placement.

Consequences of feeding the feud to Roman Reigns plot line evolution

Feeding a top singles feud like Punk vs. Rollins in a match featuring Roman Reigns may diminish the narrative power each one brings to their plot lines. Including Reigns in this feud runs the danger of overshadowing Punk and Rollins’ special dynamic. The ability for a rich narrative may be lost if Reigns is seen as just an added element rather than a fundamental one of the struggle.

Concerts so

The success of a narrative or outcome of a story is to great extent decided by audience acceptance. Fans have shown different degrees of support for Roman Reigns over time. He has a loyal following, but there are also audience groups who could be tired of his persistent appearance at the top of the card.

Fans might start believing that their preferred feud (Punky vs. Rollins) is being pushed aside just to push The OTC. As a result, the viewers who were interested in that specific narrative might become disappointed and bored.

Marketability Considerations

Business-wise, World Wrestling Entertainment tends to give first attention to marketable results that will boost viewership figures and merchandise sales. Though attracting particular groups thanks to his popularity, having Roman Reigns participate might annoy fans who want to see Punk and Rollins interact without interference from another big name.

Conclusion

From our research, Roman Reigns should be included in a top storyline for the Show of Shows given his star power. From a marketing point of view, he would seem great, given his position within WWE. However, interjecting The OTC in an already established feud of CM Punk and Seth Rollins might dilute their storyline.

It has issues associated with story integrity and viewer satisfaction. In the end, fans expecting a unique rivalry between Punk and Rollins could become discontented over the possible answer of narratives and character growth. If WWE places Roman Reigns into this fight at WrestleMania 41 and thereby compromises the expected balance between CM Punk and Seth Rollins, their choice could be viewed as an error.